Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:03
Existence of evil => God doesn’t exist
They bring up the argument because they find it convincing.
Similarly, a religious person can easily refute the argument
MLB Power Rankings as Juan Soto's Mets Plummet While Rays and Cardinals Surge - Bleacher Report
Question: Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
A rational person can easily refute a flat-earther argument that the surface of the Earth is not curved. For a flat-earther, however, his (or her) argument against a curved earth, is convincing.
For some atheists, however, the argument is convincing.
What's the difference between a zero shot, a few shot, and a chain of thought prompting?